On Thu, 30 Jul 2009, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote:
I have more complicated examples (but only very slightly more complicated)
where the amend-recorded diff is larger than the freshly recorded diff, for
similar reasons; a line which is not touched in the sequence of patches still
tweaks the diff.
Following up with such an example as Ian is interested in it:
state 1 2 3
contents h => v => v
c c
v v
The direct diff is "h" -> "v" at the start, the indirect coalesced one
removes "hc" at the start and adds "cv" at the end because it doesn't know
that "v" exists in the middle.
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
