On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Generally when reviewing patches, I read them directly, perhaps have a look > at the source they apply to, and then decide that they're fine so long as > the tests pass. Actually keeping track of them between that point and > running the tests and pushing is a bit of a pain, and there's a cognitive > shift that feels quite disruptive. > > I wonder if we can add a new status to the patch tracker to reflect the > state of "had human review, needs standard tests run"? It would make it > easier to do different jobs in batch mode, and it would also allow different > people to do the review and the actual push. > +1 I support this on the basis of this last sentence alone! Jason
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
