Hi all, [Excuse me Jason, didn't notice it was going to you personally until after I'd sent it]
Op vrijdag 19 februari 2010 19:29 schreef Jason Dagit: > In that light, it does seem that this proposal would reduce to one version > name per source version. I'm okay with that then. Or at least, willing to > see if it works better than the current system. But then, we don't have to change the numbering policy to have only one name. We can also just abolish the alpa, beta and release candidate names without changing the numbering scheme. Is there anything in favor of actually changing the numbering scheme? On a side note, the Windows Installer framework has a version naming scheme similar to hackage's, that requires that a version be a sequence of decreasingly significant numbers. So even if we would make hackage accept Debian-like ~alpha versions, we'd have to hack something up for the Windows installers that we plan to make for darcs 2.5 and beyond. Reinier
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
