On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 15:01:59 +0200, Yitzchak Gale wrote: > But darcs is version control - people's data is at stake. > We need not only the ability to reconstruct our data > with some time-consuming process; we need the ability > for our data to be actively and conveniently accessible > on all platforms that are in active use.
So, if I could shape that into a sort of question: under what circumstances would Debian stable users need to *compile* (as opposed to fetching a binary) *new* versions of Darcs? For the new bit, I think it would be if we were ever to release a version of Darcs that fixed some crucial bug (say a pending patch issue). For the compile bit, could we get away with some sort of backport that people could install? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
