Eric Kow <[email protected]> added the comment: Three points:
- I've opened issue1787 in light of Max's comments. - Whatever mechanism we need must be backwards compatible - Petr's objections (if I understand correctly) are about tagging the patches at all (and not the syntax we use for tagging). So I think we should not block this patch on the conventional considerations (Ignore-this: vs some other tagging scheme). Reinier: could you comment on Petr's reply to the high-level feedback? http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-users/2009-December/022640.html (Perhaps off-tracker if it's going to open a discussion) Meanwhile, I'll try to push the issue1739 fix ---------- assignedto: -> tux_rocker nosy: +kowey status: needs-review -> review-in-progress __________________________________ Darcs bug tracker <[email protected]> <http://bugs.darcs.net/patch167> __________________________________ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
