On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:38:07PM -0700, Simon Michael wrote: > PS more wishes, since you asked:
Thanks! > 3. Convert the main repo to hashed or darcs-2 format ? I kept it this way for backwards compatibility reasons, as I thougth darcs 1 couldn't read the new format. Is darcs 1 deprecated enough now to convert? > 4. drop per-file "tree" and "headblob" links, they seem redundant and/or > unfamiliar ? I know many of the darcsweb's terminology is unfamiliar and does not follow darcs' (commit being one of the best examples), but I'm not keen to change it now. The tree link is not redundant, as it goes back to the tree root, something for which there is no other link, and keeps it consistant with the rest of the UI. headblob is there for consistency, as it makes it easier to switch, for example, from it to filehistory and back. > 5. nicer urls, especially for patches (eg: > http://darcsden.com/alex/darcs/patch/20100321150747-f8758) I like this one, and should be doable. I'll keep it in mind! > 6. more of "darcs show repo" info on summary view Anything in particular? I don't see anything worth showing, specially considering it requires an extra darcs invocation. Most of the information are details on the repository which are relevant almost exclusively to the repo owner, which is usually not relevant since it's being browsed via web. Thanks, Alberto _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
