On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 09:44:21 -0500, Kari Hoijarvi wrote: > All these are create with 1.0.9 and used with darcs 2.3.1 I have used > darcs-2 format with my new repos, but I have not upgraded these to > paranoid fear of exposing bugs. My work depends on these. > > I'm using these both locally and over the network. Locally the > performance is fine, over the network acceptable.
Ah! a chance to wheel out the brand new FAQ entry about upgrading: http://wiki.darcs.net/FAQ#should-i-convert-my-repository-to-the-darcs-2-format In case you're already 100% up to speed on the hashed/darcs-2 distinction (it's taken us a while to communicate this effectively), then I hope this helps some other darcs users :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
