On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, Petr Rockai wrote:
It *might* actually be a reasonable compromise to only provide threading
on sensible systems (i.e. those that have openat/f*at...).
What about Windows?
In any case, hidden behind a suitable library, we can just use absolute
paths to support threading without much cost, so I don't think there is
any need for such a compromise, unless we really want to minimise the
number of possible configurations.
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
