On Tue, 20 Apr 2010, Axel Simon wrote:
I'm still trying to work out how to get the Gtk2Hs repo in sync with what I
have locally.
For what it's worth, you can just copy an entire repo around using normal
filesystem operations, if you want to get it into exact sync. That would
also clobber things like repo settings and posthooks though.
I've obliterated a few patches in code.haskell.org:/srv/gtk2hs such that
nothing occurred when saying darcs pull in my local repo. I've added all the
patches I needed and then did this:
~/source/gtk2hs $ darcs push code.haskell.org:/srv/code/gtk2hs
Thu Nov 12 22:39:16 CET 2009 [email protected]
* Add the TreeModelFilter module and a demo.
Shall I push this patch? (1/38) [ynWvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: a
Reading inventory of repository /srv/code/gtk2hs inventory
Examining patches for conflicts 2/38
darcs: Couldn't find patch matching "hash
20100409164412-c227b-45619374ae95d31dd4b6df2f1d5b11e46e1d0e68.gz"
Xtract: Ran out of input (EOF)
Finished applying...
Push successful.
The Xtract: Ran out of input message comes from your posthook, and is
presumably triggered by the previous error from darcs. My best guess from
the output and from reading the posthook script on code.haskell.org is
that the error from darcs also comes from that script, so the script
itself is buggy/out of date in some way, but the actual initial darcs
operation was fine as indicated by "Push successful".
The resulting repository is identical to my local one (darcs pull/darcs push
doesn't do anything). But I have this feeling that I should worry. Should I
worry? Has the error really occurred at the 2nd patch or might this be an
artifact?
Do a 'darcs check' on the code.haskell repo just to be sure, but I think
it's fine.
Cheers,
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
