On 29 May 2010, at 00:14, Eric Kow wrote:
Martin,
Sorry to hear about your issue1650 troubles (it could be worth
seeing if
life is any better with the 2.4.4 binary just to be sure)
I don't know about this bug, but there are other serious issues in
2.4. For example bug 1817 is a show stopper for me, because it is a
pain to merge any conflict now. I always have to make a clone of a
repo before doing any pull, because if there is a conflict, the repo
will be completely messed after the pull. Working with the constant
fear that a simple pull can result in a big mess that could take a lot
of time and irritation to fix is very annoying.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 16:02:08 +0100, Martin Szummer wrote:
Thus, I am going to downgrade darcs back to 2.2. Can I use
repositories
created with 2.4 with the 2.2 executable? It seems to work, but I
am not
sure if there will be any issues.
The reason I am wondering is that in v2.3, it was said that
"Hardlinks on
NTFS" were introduced. Thus, I wonder if the 2.2 program can deal
with any
file system tricks put in place by 2.3 or 2.4?
--
Dan
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
