On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 14:33:28 +0200, Guillaume Hoffmann wrote:
> >> 1) scp-ing a tarball of the local _darcs, untarring it and
> >> darcs-getting it. (darcs-reverting it would work but would leave all
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > This is what http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1066 recommends for what it's
> > worth
>
> Nice, this recommends that put would not rely on any instance of darcs
> on the remote machine.
> So the idea would be to do a local get, compress the whole new working
> copy + _darcs, then scp the tarball to the remote machine ?The perils of skimming! I see the difference now. (highlighted above) In terms of number of connections made, what is the effect of scp -r? How about just doing scp -C -r? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
