It's always a big help when users contribute with test cases. Thanks Lele! This is on its way to being applied.
Failing test for issue1877: pull --xml-output should not emit any verbosity --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > +# This does the right thing... at least until the second command is executed > +not darcs pull --dry-run --xml-output 2>&1 ../R | grep "Would pull" > + > +# This does not, never > +not darcs pull --summary --dry-run --xml-output 2>&1 ../R | grep "Would pull" > + > +# From now on, this fails too! > +not darcs pull --dry-run --xml-output 2>&1 ../R | grep "Would pull" As I mentioned on IRC, this is perhaps due to the defaultrepo being set. I'll bet this is actually something you could help us fix, but I've requested that Florent have a look in the meantime. Hopefully in the long term, we'll think of a good way to keep XML output intact, maybe by printing log messages with the hiddenPrinter, or developing some sort of logical log printer. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
