Hi, Ganesh Sittampalam <[email protected]> writes: > I don't know if this should go into 2.5 or not. issue1288 is listed > as milestone 2.5, but I guess it won't get reviewed before the code > freeze. I have managed to review 18 patches so far (out of 45). Those that are reviewed (and tested), I have pushed. I don't really have any comments for now. I'll try to continue tomorrow, although I expect that the tricky bits are yet to come.
> On the flip side, enforcing witnesses makes life harder for most > patch authors who aren't familiar with witnesses, and our > documentation is also very poor. So one argument might be that > we should wait until we have good documentation for witnesses > before turning them on by default. [snip] > Note that we could choose to enable them for the library but not > the executable initially - assuming we don't move to having the > executable use the library in the near future. This sounds like a reasonable compromise to me. (I don't know much about the assumption either, though.) Yours, Petr. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
