On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 00:35:14 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > This is a deliberate policy (suggested by me, I think) to reduce > confusion about whether a specific version of darcs would have a > specific hashed-storage bug fix or not. Otherwise you have to > identify both the darcs version and the h-s version in every bug > report. In other words we specifically don't want to pick up bug > fixes without revving darcs too.
I regret that despite a bit of darcs changes searching and Googling, I could not find an archived discussion on this. But I guess now we have such an archive for future use! I seem to remember that the discussion took place in the Zurich Darcs hacking sprint <http://wiki.darcs.net/Sprints/2010-03> (I didn't see any mention there, except that hashed storage was on the agenda for things to talk about) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, please try +44 (0)1273 64 2905.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
