On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 23:15:19 +0200, Petr Rockai wrote: > this also breaks with non-hashed repositories. Personally I would like > to see them deprecated anyway, so that we can stop adding code to make > them work.
In what way? It didn't jump out at me when I tried to review the patch (which seemed fairly straightforward) > I.e. I would add a prominent note to 2.6 release notes that plain > (old-fashioned) repositories are deprecated, that darcs diff is not > supported with them and future releases will remove support for further > operations. > > I believe all we really need to support is "darcs get" from an > old-fashioned repository. I'll address this in a separate thread (perhaps not immediately) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:[email protected] (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
