On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 05:09:14PM +0200, [email protected] wrote: > On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 10:32:56AM -0400, Nathan Gray wrote: > > I ran a benchmark of darcs-2.4.93.3 against a darcs-2 format copy > > of my cap repo, which is the one I used to do the darcs-1 > > benchmarks earlier this year. The results are included at the > > end of this message. I am also including the results of my > > original darcs-1 benchmark. > > So to break down, it seems to me: > - whatsnew and pull 1000 are faster with darcs 2 > - record, revert, unrevert are about the same > - pull 100, check, repair are faster with darcs 1 > > - darcs 2 full get is slower and lazy get is faster than darcs 1 get > > Also it seems that darcs 2 is quite memory-hungry compared to darcs 1. > > Could you maybe share the output of "darcs chan --from-tag . --count"? The > record times seem quite exorbitant to me... Maybe also > "find -maxdepth 1 -type f | wc -l" and "find -type f | wc -l"
The 'darcs changes' command took a couple of minutes to run and used large amounts of memory. $ darcs chan --from-tag . --count 6 $ find -maxdepth 1 -type f | wc -l 1 $ find -maxdepth 1 -type d | wc -l 36 find -type f | wc -l 64296 -kolibrie
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
