On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 09:00:29AM +0100, Sittampalam, Ganesh wrote: > Can we relax it just for libdarcs but not the darcs exe?
This could work for now, yes. I'll submit a patch (hopefully we can include that in 2.5). > This won't survive once darcs itself uses libdarcs directly, but that > might be a while anyway. > > If it gets too messy I agree we should just relax it for both. > > However in this particular case, don't you depend on 0.6.0 whereas darcs > is using 0.5.x? Is 0.6 backwards compatible enough that we could depend > on >=0.5.2 and < 0.7 in darcs? I depend on 0.5.3, actually (0.6 is a long shot still). The dependency is on some minor API additions and (major) performance improvements (partially enabled by the new APIs). I'll release 0.5.3 in the near future. > darcs-fastconvert, perhaps? Sounds reasonable, so unless someone comes up with a better name, I'll stick to that. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
