Alexey Levan wrote: > 2010/8/23 Eric Kow <[email protected]>: >> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:17:41 +0200, Benjamin Franksen wrote: >>> > darcs changes xxx >>> Changes to MotorApp/docu/xxx: >>> >>> Tue Aug 19 14:30:36 CEST 2008 [email protected] >>> * Converted from 3.13 (MotorApp) >> >> Sounds like http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1397 to me. > > Almost. It's http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1632, issue1397 is about > filtering out ("fixing") paths that aren't part of repository.
Oops, looks like I already reported this one a while ago. Take it as a reminder, then... > Fixing > this one will require some clever trick to not cause a performance > regression, I'll look what can be done about it. > >> This is actually resolved by a patch that's still pending amendment. >> http://bugs.darcs.net/patch191 >> >> If Alexey is too busy to amend it, I'd suggest one of the Darcs Team >> look into it > > That's not necesarry, I'll make an amendment soon. Thanks. Let me give a bit of context to explain why I stumbled over this one for the second time. What I actually wanted to do is to extract the author and date of the latest change for some given file (relative to the current working directory), or else fail if the file is not part of a darcs repo. It would be cool if issuing darcs changes --max-count=1 --xml-output <filename> could be reliably used to achieve this (i.e. output an empty set of patches if no change to the given file has been recorded). Cheers Ben _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
