On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:56:08 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > The automated traffic is very noisy. Some days about 2/3 of it is > Eric muttering under his breath about what he should be doing but > probably is going to have to postpone until the Year 2525. ;-)
Yep! See for yourself if you don't believe Stephen: - http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/2010-August/thread.html - http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/darcs-devel/2010-September/thread.html > (Just kidding, Eric, it really doesn't bother me.) It's mostly of > interest for auditing process later IMO. :-) My approach to BTS usage is very heavily geared towards explicit tracking and very incremental (high-granularity) intermediary milestones To make matters worse, I've also taken on the galling habit of adding metanoise to the mix, so you not only noise from the Process, but noise *about* the Process (tagged "BTS training"; my hope is that one day this will be useful to a future Issue Manager), and meta-meta noise in which I apologise for the meta-noise. So basically you should treat darcs-devel as being almost entirely machine generate (like a -commits list), only the machine happens to be named Eric and sits behind a keyboard. [Alternatively, somebody could just stop the insanity by volunteering as Issue Manager] -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:[email protected] (Jabber or Google Talk only)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
