On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 14:47:43 +0100, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > Although in theory ComP could be nested, I've never seen this > happen.
General plan seems sensible. I might be more comfortable with a stronger statement than "I've never seen this happen" :-), something along the lines of "in the source code, Darcs only ever uses the ComP constructor with non-ComP prims", or "darcs treats ComP [ComP foo bar] exactly as it might ComP [foo bar]" In any case, quite reassuring to see that at the very least, we now knom more about the on disk patch format. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:[email protected] (Jabber or Google Talk only)
pgpxS7C4Ipysu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
