On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 12:50:46 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > One stylistic nit to pick: "explaining the details without detail" is > awkward. How about "explaining the [algorithmic] design of Darcs > without implementation detail"?
I went with just design of Darcs. Thanks! -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> For a faster response, try +44 (0)1273 64 2905 or xmpp:[email protected] (Jabber or Google Talk only)
pgp3YdQifCJfo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
