Do you need bug-stuff as primitive patches to do that? I think that could be done without make Darcs patch-stuff even more complex.
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Florent Becker <[email protected] > wrote: > Le 15/11/2010 20:13, Iago Abal a écrit : > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Simon Michael <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Fossil's extremely simple single-executable out-of-the-box > >> dvcs/tracker/wiki is very cool. I'd love to see a tool like this built > on > >> darcs. > > > > Interesting :) Maybe do something that can work with a variety of dCVSs > will > > be even more interesting! > > > On the other hand, having an "add bug/resolve bug/add test for bug…" > primitive patch type in darcs could open new possibilities. (For > instance, define a release goal as a set of bugs that have to be > resolved, and won't commute with their resolution; search for patches > that resolve some issue without relying on magic strings; be warned when > one of the forks of your repo resolves one of your bugs…) > > Florent > > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users > -- Iago Abal Rivas
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
