On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 06:19:27PM +0300, Dan Pascu wrote: > > TBH, revert/unrevert would cover 90% of what I use git-stash for. But > > this workflow should be explicitly documented if it's going to be kept > > around, IMHO - it's a useful feature in its own right, not just an undo > > command or something there to preserve an abstract symmetry! > > unrevert is the undo for revert. otherwise you can lose your work > because you called revert without thinking ahead.
Yes, I get that. What I meant by "not just an undo command" is "it's an undo command, yes, but revert/unrevert *also* gives you stash functionality, which is a useful workflow that we should tell people about". My point is that sometimes it's a good idea to call revert *while planning to call unrevert later*. Miles -- It is better to be deprived of food for three days than of tea for one. -- Confucius _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
