On 5 Apr 2012, at 16:24, John Lato wrote: > > That discussion has convinced me of > > 1. "darcs obliterate" should actually, (unrecoverably?) delete stuff.
Yes. The name choice was deliberate. It used to be called “unpull”, but we switched to obliterate to indicate destructiveness. > What if a new command "darcs stash" is added, which is just an alias > to "darcs obliterate -O_darcs/stash/$timestamp" ? Or some other > helpful name, which again is simply an alias to the current > "obliterate -O" behavior? Counter-proposal: bring back unpull! http://bugs.darcs.net/issue557 -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
