On 10 September 2012 15:49, Gracjan Polak <[email protected]> wrote:
> Silent pushing of dependent patches when the reason of dependency is not > clear was my main issue with darcs. > > 1. darcs push > 2. select patches I want to push > 3. discover that something else to my understanding unrelated got > pushed too (darcs was thinking differently) > 4. work hard to fix upstream repo > > > I can't recall Darcs ever "silently" pushing patches it didn't ask me about. What do you mean by unrelated? Unless there's a textual overlap, distinct changes should not arbitrarily depend on each other. Can you remember what the situation was? Cheers, Owen.
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
