Zbigniew, > Anyway, I'm aware it's rather a matter of personal taste, but I'm > convinced > that after you examine both pictures again - and even more closely - > you'll > agree that this Silkypix-made is a little bit better. The one you > generated > shows the surface of car body as covered with a little scratches > (zoom to 1:1 and compare).
That's luminance noise and certainly not a problem to me. If you print the picture it will be far better with a bit of luminance noise as it create "matter" on the surface. It avoids long, flat surface. I usually never correct luminance noise or if I do I'm doing it very slightly. > So you mean presently fixable only by denoising? OK, thanks - I'll > explore > Darktable's abilities in this area; I'm rather displeased with the > way I was > able to cure the problem using LR 5.7.1 (well, still not being "LR- > wizard") > - that's why I was looking for the software which do import, after > which > there's no need to deal with that red noise. Maybe they ware right > that presently only Canon's DPP does it 100% properly. I doubt it. But Canon DPP is certainly quite tuned for .CR2 :) But on the other hand Canon DPP is a toy compare to darktable. -- Pascal Obry / Magny Les Hameaux (78) The best way to travel is by means of imagination http://www.obry.net gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
