.> correction in the EOS-1D X Mark II is applied to RAWs only. See > https://snapshot.canon-asia.com/article/en/eos-5d-mark-iv-le ns-aberration-correctiona-close-up-look-part-1
<https://snapshot.canon-asia.com/article/en/eos-5d-mark-iv-lens-aberration-correctiona-close-up-look-part-1> <https://snapshot.canon-asia.com/article/en/eos-5d-mark-iv-lens-aberration-correctiona-close-up-look-part-1> I cannot read on this link that the correction in done on the RAW. In the past, the lens identification was in the EXIF and DPP has a database of these lenses. It was then applying the corrections. In camera the only correction applied to the JPEG was the vignetting (this is the case on EOS 7D and EOS 5D Mk II at least). If I follow the link to the 1D Mk II, I can read: "The EOS-1D X Mark II is equipped with an IC that was specially developed to enable correction by the Digital Lens Optimizer (DLO) during in-camera RAW image post-processing." But "in-camera processing of the RAW" doesnt mean the RAW is affected. This is done in the RAW -> JPEG in-camera conversion. My son is a photographer. For the newspapers, they use only the in-camera JPEG. This is because in the past there was too many "fake" photographies. And they have tools to say if the picture has been retouched in Photoshp/what_you_want. All is allowed is crop / Brightness / Saturation / Contrast. I can be wrong about these camera but I will get some raw from a 5D MK IV and see if the raw is affected Jean-Luc ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
