After reading all the posts in this thread i want send my own view to
this. RT and DT are both great tools with different pros and cons. The
most important points for me are:
RT is much simpler to use and the denoise-modul gives great results
without hour-long parameter tweaking or years of learning.
DT has the great parametric masks feature
I hope someone will do the porting of the RT-denoise to DT. Together
with the RAW-denoise and the profiled-denoise it will be (for me) the
perfect way to remove noise.
Jan Ingwer Baer
On 03-Nov-18 17:58, Andrey L wrote:
Hello, guys. Canon DPP makes me crazy, but DT is unable to compete with
neither Canon DPP, nor RawTherapee :(
Could you please pay some attention to DarkTable's noise removal
opportunities?
I have to spend senconds with Canon DPP to suppress noise on high-iso
image,
I need minutes to get a good result in RawThrerapee, but nobody can spend
hours
to make bad result with tons of noise reduction tools. Please, break the
last barrier to DT :`|
Here my example:
original image:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz9fwFLCJOjNMnJlTzgwcHZOdTA
canon dpp:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz9fwFLCJOjNc1RoWW9kN3d3V0k
rawtherapee:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0Bz9fwFLCJOjNNnZWNjVSYXhaX28
The best efforts In general lead to green noise on barbells. It's too
complex problem for regular photographer.
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
___________________________________________________________________________
darktable developer mailing list
to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
