Hi, filmic RGB works in a native RGB space, while the previous filmic worked in a native Lab space and did the RGB conversion internally.
The difference is in the blending and masking options : old filmic had (non-linear) Lab blending parameters, while filmic RGB has (linear) RGB blending parameters. Also, the old filmic used a fixed ProPhoto RGB space, while the new uses the user-defined RGB working space. I put "RGB" in the name because many users asked me which modules work in RGB and which work in Lab, and there is no way to differenciate them in UI. Cheers, Aurélien. Le 06/11/2019 à 19:33, François Tissandier a écrit : > Well, look at Sony RX100. Sony keeps producing and selling several > generations at the same time, right ? > > François > > Le mer. 6 nov. 2019 à 18:56, Julian Rickards > <julian.ricka...@gmail.com <mailto:julian.ricka...@gmail.com>> a écrit : > > Not quite sure how to interpret "entertaining". I was approaching > this from a different point of view, one that we take here at my > workplace. When a new model of a camera is released (OMD E-M5 Mk > III for example), the manufacturer generally doesn't continue to > produce any of the previous versions (the original or Mk 1 model > or the Mk II model). > > Denoise is offered in 3 forms (not #1, #2 and #3) because they > work differently, more differently than simply adding a drop down > within one copy of this module and for that reason, the names of > the denoise modules do not end in 1, 2 or 3 but with a descriptive > word or two. The Tone Curve now offers RGB, Lab and XYZ as drop > downs because they are similar enough to bundle together but if > filmic2 operates much differently than filmic, this might be an > argument to keep both "versions". > > However, if the intent of the developers is to have users use > filmic2 instead of filmic, don't give them the option, just offer > filmic2 as the only filmic. > > Another consideration might be: if it is unlikely that a user > might want to use both filmic and filmic2, then again, don't give > them the option. > > Just my 2¢, that's all. > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 12:19 PM Moritz Moeller > <virtualr...@gmail.com <mailto:virtualr...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 6.11.19 14:35, Julian Rickards wrote: > > From my perspective, filmic2 isn't appropriate. I work in the > > publication services section of an Ontario (Canada) > government ministry > > and when we assign "2" to a publication, "1" is gone and no > longer > > available. > > That's the most entertaining reasoning for naming something > I've ever > read on a software mailing list. :D > > > If the original filmic is gone from this version, then I > would just name > > the new one filmic. If the original filmic will also be > available, just > > like the various denoise modules, this new filmic should > have an > > additional descriptor such as filmic rgb. > > How about naming the old module 'filmic (deprecated)' in the > UI and the > new one just 'filmic'. > Behind the scenes (XMP etc.) they can be called 'filmic' and > 'filmic2'. > > > Beers, > > .mm > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list > to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > <mailto:darktable-dev%2bunsubscr...@lists.darktable.org> > > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org > <mailto:darktable-dev%2bunsubscr...@lists.darktable.org> > > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to > darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org ___________________________________________________________________________ darktable developer mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-dev+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
