Tobias Ellinghaus <me@...> writes: > > Am Montag, 28. März 2016, 12:59:37 schrieb Tobias Ellinghaus: > > [...] > > > What is the output of > > > > rpm -ql OpenEXR-devel > > > > and > > > > dnf provides /lib/libIlmImf-2_2.so.22 > > > > ? > > Please also try running > > rpm -Va > > > Tobias > > > > [...] >
Thanks for copying to Anton. Suspect this is now a system/configuration problem, not yours. But in trying to clear up a final *coughs* misunderstanding, could you please clarify: the commands I ran earlier on your suggestion, tell me that OpenEXR is installed. However, the most recent output from rpm -Va clearly lists /usr/lib64/libIlmImf-2_2.so.22 and /usr/lib64/libIlmImf-2_2.so.22.0.0 as missing. Just as a means of further verification (I accept that I shouldn't need to be building my own copy), if I try to compile from the tar, and at the point the compiler stops, saying it has a problem with "libIlmImf.so", and I run "dnf provides", it comes back to tell me its installed already, having refreshed and downloaded from all the available repos. So it cannot be both installed and missing at the same time. However, I note that the rpm -Va and the dnf install information aren't actually pointing to the same thing. One is in /usr/lib64, the other is in /usr/lib. Do I have to somehow force install it to the /lib64 location? Or can I recompile DT to look in the more local /usr/lib? Or is this all nonsense? I'm trying to estimate whether I can fix this basic system config error, or whether I need to spend another day completely reinstalling everything from scratch? Problem is, I've no guaranteee that if I wipe and reinstall this problem will go away. ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
