Hello all, I checked the https://www.darktable.org/development/
There is no reference to possible contributions for packaging the software or other non dev tasks. Maybe more technical than dev people would love to join the team for such tasks. Although contributing to the code seems to be an enormous step (dev skills+image processing skills+understanding the existing code...), giving a hand on more technical stuff might be easier and reacheable for some of us working in the IS business. Best regards, Laurent 2018-01-14 21:07 GMT+01:00 J Albrecht <[email protected]>: > > On 14 Jan 2018, at 14:18, Robert Krawitz <[email protected]> wrote: > > Speaking from experience, I strongly suggest signing the package. > Current users may be OK with the workaround, but growing the userbase > will require pulling in new users who don't want to turn off the > signing requirement (which is there for a reason, and even if it > weren't, is something Apple strongly discourages and > *Mac users tend tolisten to Appl*e). > > > This is probably true for the same sheeple who swear by Lightroom and > Photoshop. However, for *enlightened* Mac users of dt and say, GIMP, I > don’t think that it’s an issue. As has been shown, they accept the unsigned > DMGs because they understand that darktable isn’t a commercial product. If > the members of the former group complain, so be it. They can complain along > with those who lament that GIMP isn’t a functional replica of PS. > Meanwhile, the rest of us can continue to benefit from the use of these > great programs. > I’d hate for the devs to halt packaging for MAC just because having to > sign the packages gets in the way. > > ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to [email protected]
