"I made that comment and on further consideration, it was un-called for. dt is excellent in processing images, raw and otherwise. I perhaps was becomeing somewhat frustrated trying to explain that the jpg images out of camera were processed in-camera whereas the raw was not and felt the OP believed otherwise. many do not understand the out-of-camera jpg's are not expected to represent how the unprocessed raw appears."
I appreciate what you are saying. People expect the raw to look the same as the jpg. As you correctly say, they are night and day different. In the very beginning I didn't get it either. I was not calling you out - I omitted your name purposefully. You've made so many and such positive contributions here that I know your intentions are very right. If it sounds like I was taking you to task, I apologize. My intent was to point out that the public image of darktable is incorrect and limiting, and that it needs to be spoken of as a premier image editor that can work with many image files, raw or not. ____________________________________________________________________________ darktable user mailing list to unsubscribe send a mail to darktable-user+unsubscr...@lists.darktable.org
