Am 11.06.2013 10:31, schrieb ary brami: > Hi everybody, > > I just publish on my blog a post about developement of the same image, with > lightroom and darktable. > The picture was VERY noisy (ISO 6400, at night), and on that point, I must > admit that I didn't achived to reduce the noise in Darktable as well as in > Lightroom. > If somebody want to try to do better, the link to download the raw file is in > the post here : > http://aventurereflex.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/darktable-vs-lightroom-le-logiciel-dadobe-est-il-un-must-pour-les-photographes/ > > We will renew this type of developement both in LR and in DT, sure that some > time, DR will be closer or even better thant LR. > > Ary >
Hello Ary, that is interesting. And I am actually shocked about the big difference between Lightroom and Darktable. I find two aspects very odd. (1) DT has a noise profile for the 600D at iso3200. Even with that it is almost impossible to reduce the noise properly. And Denoise (non-local means and bilateral) do not do any better. I thought that noise profiles is the best you can get in terms of noise reduction. (2) The color cast in the background is weird. The blue background of the DT image looks artificial while the grey background of the Lightroom picture looks much more natural. And by the way, rawtherapee is not doing any better than DT. Kind Regards Matthias ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
