(again, I was wrong about exposure, this applies only to WB)
it's more about what WB fundamentally is than how we implement it, but yes
there are technicall reasons why you can't do that
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Richard Levitte <[email protected]> wrote:
> So what you're saying is that there are technical reasons, and they
> are about how dt, or at least those modules are constructed.
>
> In message <CALXjwtP5yX-24HZM=
> [email protected]> on Thu, 1 Aug 2013
> 10:56:22 +0200, jeremy rosen <[email protected]> said:
>
> jeremy.rosen> to put it simply, you cannot not have some sort of
> exposure/white balance on parts of images.
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> you could have a gradiant/mask between two values, but you
> can not have no EV compensation or WB
> jeremy.rosen> at all.
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> arguably it would be interesting to have a way to do that,
> in particular for WB where different
> jeremy.rosen> zones of an image can have different color-casts, but that's
> not a simple case of enabling blendif
> jeremy.rosen> /masks on the module. it's a redesign...
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Gonçalo Marrafa <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> Hi.
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> I posted this question (twice) on DT's Google+ comunity (
> http://goo.gl/CBvw7y) but got no answer, so i'm trying this mailing list
> :)
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> Why aren't masks/conditional blending available in white
> balance and exposure modules? Is it a technical reason or an implementation
> decision? It would be nice to be able to adjust white balance and/or
> exposure only on parts of the image, like in LR, for example.
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> Thanks in advance.
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> Gonçalo Marrafa
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen>
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> jeremy.rosen> > Get your SQL database under version control now!
> jeremy.rosen> > Version control is standard for application code, but
> databases havent
> jeremy.rosen> > caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL
> databases under
> jeremy.rosen> > version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more
> to find out.
> jeremy.rosen> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> jeremy.rosen> > _______________________________________________
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> >
> jeremy.rosen> > Darktable-users mailing list
> jeremy.rosen> > [email protected]
> jeremy.rosen> >
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
> jeremy.rosen>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
