Hi Johannes,
Here is another example:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/fo8iqgrasilrm7p/rb2zNRt0ZC
I have included the two jpgs with display profile and sRGB and also xmp and
the original raw file.
Timo
On 4 August 2013 22:34, Timo Mohnani <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Johannes,
>
> Here is another example including the xmp file.
>
> Timo
>
>
> On 2 August 2013 11:36, johannes hanika <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Timo Mohnani <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Here is an example of the situation:
>>>
>>> sRGBProfile_IMG_8438 -
>>> http://lovenlaughter.smugmug.com/NotForPublic/Photography/Posted-Images/i-bp9cjxj/0/X3/sRGBProfile_IMG_8438-O.jpg
>>>
>>> SystemDispProfile_IMG_8438 -
>>> http://lovenlaughter.smugmug.com/NotForPublic/Photography/Posted-Images/i-kmLM6jr/0/X3/SystemDispProfile_IMG_8438-O.jpg
>>>
>>
>> so that is exported with your wide gamut profile, and thus renders a lot
>> flatter.. i think it looks exactly like the profile is ignored and the data
>> is interpreted as srgb instead (which has a smaller gamut and thus
>> compresses down the colors). if that is also how it looked on your screen
>> in darkroom mode maybe darktable wasn't actually configured to color manage
>> properly? i know nothing about kde, but darktable tries to read the icc
>> profile primaries from the xatom, and you need to install the lut into your
>> video card, too. maybe you're also running with colord support?
>>
>> j.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I won't be able to provide xmps until monday.
>>>
>>> Timo
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2 August 2013 11:11, johannes hanika <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> do you have a sample image + xmp so i can check on my machine?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 9:36 AM, Timo Mohnani <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Chrome has been color managed since version 22. We are currently on
>>>>> version 28.
>>>>>
>>>>> Timo
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2 August 2013 10:29, johannes hanika <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> oh, chrome is color managed now? i would tend to think if chrome and
>>>>>> firefox look the same you don't have color management setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> j.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Timo Mohnani
>>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear Johannes,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have looked at the images in Digikam, Gwenview and Showfoto. My
>>>>>>> screen is calibrated last week and I have my profile activated in KDE.
>>>>>>> On
>>>>>>> top of that I have uploaded the images to the internet and viewed them
>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>> Chrome and Firefox. Other people have done the same on other computers.
>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>> even asked one other DT user to carry out a similar process on his own
>>>>>>> images and he too ended up with the same result. The sRGB are warmer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is something more to this.......
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Timo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2 August 2013 09:29, johannes hanika <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you're probably looking at your exported images from a non-color
>>>>>>>> managed application.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Timo Mohnani <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Is it normal that when you export with the sRGB color profile, the
>>>>>>>>> resulting jpg has a slightly red tint (or warm) color to it compared
>>>>>>>>> to the
>>>>>>>>> edited image in the darkroom? This happens to all my images. To make
>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>> images work I need to go to the "output color profile" module and
>>>>>>>>> choose
>>>>>>>>> sRGB as my display profile. But this kind of defeats the purpose of
>>>>>>>>> having
>>>>>>>>> a wide-gamut screen.
>>>>>>>>> I would assume that I would be able to edit my images using my
>>>>>>>>> calibrated screen profile and then when exporting with sRGB I would
>>>>>>>>> end up
>>>>>>>>> with an image that was quite similar.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Timo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Get your SQL database under version control now!
>>>>>>>>> Version control is standard for application code, but databases
>>>>>>>>> havent
>>>>>>>>> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases
>>>>>>>>> under
>>>>>>>>> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find
>>>>>>>>> out.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Darktable-users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
