Has not been there some change regarding the lens matching algorithm? As far as i remember, some heuristic has been used before and i think it has been disabled/removed because of false positives?
For this reason i recently created an own, local subsbset of the lensfun db containing the lenses i am owning, and matched the lens names to the exact strings printed by exiftool (or exiv2? i do not remember this detail any more). Voila, it works! Regards, Markus Am 06.10.2013 19:32, schrieb Torsten Bronger: > Hallöchen! > > Frank Fesevur writes: > >> [...] >> >> So now my questions are: >> Why are there two entries for the same lens? > > No idea. I removed one of them. But this duplication is very, very > old (from SVN version 1 on). It can only be seen with Canon > cameras. > >> Which one should I choose? > > I removed the one for cropfactor 1.6 because crop 1.5 works also for > non-Canon APS-C. Other than that, there is no difference unless one > of the calibration contributors did something wrong. > >> Although very likely related to the above, why did 1.1.2 recognize >> the lens and 1.2.3 not anymore? > > Probably an exiv2 issue. But I am no expert on this. > > Tschö, > Torsten. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134791&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
