http://friedmanarchives.blogspot.de/2012/10/the-most-distortion-ridden-zeiss-lens.html Most RX-100 owners who try this same experiment at home will likely never notice this horrid distortion, because Sony also did something very clever to keep you from seeing it: they re-defined their RAW file format to include lens correction attributes in the EXIF information. ... They’re there so that high-end RAW processing software like Bibble, DxO, or Lightroom could take note of those settings when opening the RAW file, and automatically adjust the sliders to make it look like what the camera would have produced had it been shooting a .jpg. ... So what Sony did was extend that concept, making note of all the optical corrections the .jpg engine would have made and write them to the RAW file.
After loading the night-shot sample from http://www.dkamera.de/testbericht/sony-cyber-shot-dsc-rx100/beispielaufnahmen.html : http://www.dkamera.de/media/testberichte/sony/cyber-shot-dsc-rx100/6_beispielaufnahmen/bilder/4_real_raw/03.ARW?download I see that the raw-file is a lot more distorted than the jpg-sample. Do I need a plugin? Can Darktable use the processing info in the raw-file? -- Αl ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DreamFactory - Open Source REST & JSON Services for HTML5 & Native Apps OAuth, Users, Roles, SQL, NoSQL, BLOB Storage and External API Access Free app hosting. Or install the open source package on any LAMP server. Sign up and see examples for AngularJS, jQuery, Sencha Touch and Native! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63469471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
