I have been using a Fuji X100S camera for a few months now and have found some 
confusion on forums as to how Fuji handles their Dynamic Range (DR%) 
adjustments, particularly with regard to raw output. I thought I would post a 
synopsis of my personal findings for those interested now that the Fuji X-trans 
sensor cameras are supported on dt.

Fujifilm, despite providing raw image data, appear to be intent on making an 
effort to seriously improve and encourage photographers to use jpg camera 
output. Their camera controls allow for both significant pre and post shot 
adjustments to the tone curve, the color model, sharpening, noise reduction 
and most importantly the image's dynamic range; working from the raw into the 
jpg format.

Some early tests using jpg output did confirm that the dynamic range, using the 
DR% settings, is greatly improved .... my question was, how can I utilize this 
while shooting raw?

Yesterday I made a test, photographing a test card with the camera fixed on a  
tripod, I photographed the card with aperture priority setting with the camera  
retaining both raw+jpg. I made 3 exposures as follows:
1.) ISO.200 @ DR.100%, 2.) [email protected]% and 3.)[email protected]%

The files were opened in dt and the 3 jpgs looked identical with all of the 
histograms totally matching.
The 3 raw files were opened and striped of all processing except the demosaic, 
the higher ISO images all indicated underexposure and when I added 1 EV to the 
ISO.400, and 2 EV to the ISO 800 all of the raw images were also identical in 
all histogram bands.

It appears that when using the DR settings, all that Fuji is doing is 
underexposing by 1 or 2 EV in order to 'protect' any highlights and then 
'overdevelop' (or expand the range) accordingly. 

Fuji cameras show the end result of all of the various settings in their 
display systems, as if one was shooting jpg alone,  so this alleviates 
problems that could occur with metering when shooting raw. Expanding the range 
in dt simply involves a change in the EV within the exposure model .... all 
really quite simple.

In real world tests I have used this approach in some fairly extreme night 
scenes with subjects containing both bare bulbs and deep shadows, it works 
really well .... and ..... without encountering an apparent noise gain ... all 
quite satisfactory.

I have been working with Dan's dt X-trans branch for some time now, it has 
been rock-solid during development and I am very pleased that it now gets 
merged into dts' main stream.

David

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and
search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck
Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code
search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to