On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:02 AM, Bernhard <[email protected]> wrote: > that's not an option for me since I want to digitize my archive only once > and keep ALL information the scanner deliveres for potential future use and > improvement of the results. > And negatives seem to be very sensitive to scratches :-( .
That would be an argument for keeping the IR channel. How can it be used in processing to get rid of scratches? > Tim Gray explains the different options of "RAW scanning" in Vuescan here > http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showpost.php?p=1843660&postcount=2 > and he also comes to the conclusion we worked out here: >> >> Lastly, and I think the best, RAW TIFF: gamma 1, no funny file formats. > > so thanks again. You helped me "stabilize my workflow". So are you now going to produce RGBI TIFF files? Do those work in darktable? They do seem like the most sensible option. Is there any software out there capable of using the RGBI data to cleanup scratches? Cheers, Pedro ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dive into the World of Parallel Programming! The Go Parallel Website, sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is your hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take a look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
