there's a stupid trick you could try (see attached xmp). i learned it from
this mailing list, i think from david vincent jones iirc..

-jo

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Ulrich Pegelow <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> yes, I also can confirm that RT really excels in highlight
> reconstruction and is ahead of darktable (*). IMHO this has two aspects:
>
> 1) RT controls all this from one single panel. So there are only few
> clicks needed to get to the desired result.
>
> 2) Color reconstruction of blown-out highlights works very well.
>
> I think the first aspect is a question of UI philosophy. Highlight
> reconstruction involves different steps (dealing with clipped channels
> in pre-demosaic, negative exposure correction, color reconstruction)
> which in the case of darktable involves different modules. I think there
> are good arguments for our way of working.
>
> The second aspect is certainly something we need to work on. RT has a
> method called "color propagation" which seems to work better than our
> "color reconstruction" (which already has been a big step forward).
>
> I am not sure if we can get much better within the current "highlight
> recovery" module - maybe this is job for a separate module that works on
> demosaiced data.
>
> Ulrich
>
> (*) Driven by the example image provided by Istvan I have worked a bit
> on the shadows&highlights module. You can find my work in PR 866. This
> further helps in correcting blown out highlights but still lacks a
> convincing color recovery.
>
> Am 22.02.2015 um 19:28 schrieb Markus Jung:
> > Am 22.02.2015 um 19:18 schrieb KOVÁCS István:
> >> I've tried dcraw -E (just dump the raw pixels without
> >> demosaicing/highlight recovery etc.), then used a 2x2 convolution
> >> matrix in the Gimp to join the 2x2 R-G-B-R blocks into a single pixel.
> >> The result is at
> >> http://tech.kovacs-telekes.org/files/DSC_4684/DSC_4684-dcraw_-E.jpg -
> >> lots of highlight details are available, but I have been unable to get
> >> usable highlights from either darktable, digikam, dcraw (used -b 0.5
> >> to reduce exposure by 1EV, and tried all highlight recovery modes of
> >> dcraw).
> >>
> >> Anyone?
> >
> > I tried to recover them with darktable, too. The best results have been
> > archived by using the new highlight recovery mode "reconstruct color"
> > but RawTherapee did a noticeable better job.
> > I guess darktable lacks some more enhanced highlight recovery algorithm.
> > Maybe one of the devs will notice your example and has some more ideas.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Markus
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
> from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
> with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
> Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
>
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Darktable-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
>

Attachment: DSC_4684.NEF.xmp
Description: Binary data

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users

Reply via email to