> Frankly reading the exchanges it sounds to me that your workflow is far
> too complex. I would sit down, learn how to use darktable import,
> tagging and collections. And I would fit darktable into play. I also
> think that one need to adapt its workflow to a software rich as dt is
> rather than the opposite. This will pay back in the long run.
I'm a happy darktable user, but I have to throw in my two cents in
the opposite direction here. I think it's perfectly sensible to do
collection management outside of darktable and its database. Over the
sufficiently long term a photographer may well move between multiple
environments for developing and processing RAW photos; I myself have
moved between three already[*]. Trusting collection management to your
RAW processor amounts to a bet that either you won't make such a move
in the future or that your collection management can be exported into
your new environment. If this bet fails, you have serious problems.
Collection management outside your RAW processor preserves your
freedom to move between RAW processors and to easily experiment
with new ones.
- cks
[*: Bibble, then AfterShot Pro, then darktable.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor 25 network devices or servers for free with OpManager!
OpManager is web-based network management software that monitors
network devices and physical & virtual servers, alerts via email & sms
for fault. Monitor 25 devices for free with no restriction. Download now
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/292181274;119417398;o
_______________________________________________
Darktable-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
