Am Dienstag, 30. Juni 2015, 10:25:17 schrieb Pascal Obry: > Le mardi 30 juin 2015 à 10:20 +0200, Sebastian a écrit : > > Additionally a tag would be nice. E.g. darktable|duplicate or > > darktable|original|[id] > > But this needs more discussion: what do you think? > > I would be in favor of adding only a darktable|duplicate for duplicate > images.
Well, any image can have more than one representation in the database (and therefore XMPs), but besides the technical detail that one of them was there first there are no duplicates of some master representation, they are all equal. So while it's totally trivial to select for version > 0 it doesn't really make sense. Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/
_______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
