On 13 Apr 2010, at 17:48, Jim Procter wrote:

> Thanks for posting this, Andy.
> 
> 
> On 13/04/2010 14:44, Andy Jenkinson wrote:
>> Afterwards, two proposals emerged: firstly, that the DAS specification make 
>> a simple recommendation to use existing HTTP digest authentication, leaving 
>> DAS software to implement the components independently. Secondly, a 
>> DAS-specific delegated authentication model based around a trusted third 
>> party (probably the DAS registry) as the identity provider.
>> 
>> Each proposal has its own advantages and disadvantages in terms of both 
>> security and implementation considerations which we now need to debate 
>> within the community before we come up with a recommendation, so I have 
>> summarised both proposals on the wiki:
>> http://www.biodas.org/wiki/DAS1.6E#Authentication
>>   
> I didn't participate in the fine details of the discussion last friday, but I 
> wondered afterwards if anyone had considered adopting the Globus 
> authentication model. Grid based authentication for programmatic web services 
> has now been around for a number of years in a number of guises (the  Globus 
> toolkit is the one I know of), and may already address all the requirements 
> and concerns raised at the meeting.
> 
> My 2c..
> Jim.
> 
> ps. I can point out some people who may be worth approaching regarding Globus 
> or Shibboleth style third-party ident/auth middleware if people wish.

Definitely worth a shout, I'll do some research.
_______________________________________________
DAS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das

Reply via email to