Ah, that makes sense. As for a US meeting, there are 3 or 4 folks here at the U of Utah that would attend an out of state meeting. The bay area would be ideal (thanks Suzi!). It might be best to make this part of a larger genomics/ proteomics meeting to start. This would draw more folks who are interested in distributing their own data and working DAS access into their own applications. Are their any appropriate upcoming meetings?
-cheers, D On 2/4/11 1:57 PM, "Andy Jenkinson" <[email protected]> wrote: Hi David, I guess one of the big reasons to want a proxy is it allows you to use DAS sources you don't control, which is obviously potentially a really big benefit with so many DAS/1 sources around. I don't know if this is what Jim is trying to achieve though. In truth this has always been the difficulty with the das/das2 tech divide really, with such a huge existing implementation base there's a very high "activation energy" in switching! What was the issue with the ensembl servers? Jon and I have talked a few times about organising a DAS workshop in North America, we just need someone to host (and to an extent fund) it. Do you have any suggestions? Almost all of the attendees for our workshops are from Europe, in fact lots are from Hinxton. So what sort of demand do you think there would be stateside for such an event? Enough for a standalone workshop, or more conducive to an add-on to or collaboration with another event? Maybe we can look into webcasting the talks? No idea how to go about this though! On 4 Feb 2011, at 19:13, David Nix wrote: > Hello Jim, > > If I make a suggestion. If you're looking to visualize genomic data in IGB, > it would be best to use a DAS/2 server such as the Classic (command line) or > GenoPub (web app/ relational database) GenoViz DAS/2 server. DAS/2 is well > suited to moving large amounts of sliced graph (gr, sgr, bedgraph, wig, bar, > useq...) and alignment data (ie BAM) to client apps. We're continuing to > develop the GenoPub DAS/2 server with 5 year grant support from NHLBI so > expect continuing improvements (bulk uploading and file conversion, > annotation via ontologies, super group visibility settings, additional file > formats, etc.). See > http://bioserver.hci.utah.edu/BioInfo/index.php/Software:DAS2 and our paper > http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/11/455 > > GenoViz folks, correct me if I'm wrong here but I believe the GenoViz DAS/2 > server supports DAS xml datasets so moving data from a DAS/1 server to DAS/2 > wouldn't require any data reformatting. Although for large datasets, it's > best to use one of the compressed binary data formats such as bar, bam, or > useq. > > IGB comes pre configured with the UCSC and Ensembl DAS/1 servers. This works > well for accessing their small annotation datasets (gene models: refseq, > knowngenes), but the graph distribution wasn't functional the last I checked. > The problem appeared to be from the server side. > > -cheers, David > > P.S. I wish I could attend the DAS workshop this year and show you what we've > been up to. Any chance of getting a Skype conference call with posted > presentations? Would be great if someone hosted a DAS Workshop in the US. > > > On 2/4/11 8:19 AM, "Gregg Helt" <[email protected]> wrote: > > The core genomancer code is pretty stable, most of the recent work is > in plugins (and some work in the core to allow more extensive > plugins). > > You should be able to get a working DAS1-->DAS2 proxy running from > the current head of the Trellis SVN repository -- you would just need > to add a web.xml config file with servlet parameters to get it going in a > servlet container like Tomcat, or alternatively run the built-in Jetty server > (ExampleJettyDas2Server) and edit servlet parameters directly in code. > > But if the intent is to load DAS 1.x data into IGB, I don't think you > need to use Trellis. Th latest IGB (6.4.1 loaded via WebStart) > already supports DAS 1.5 access. In the "Data Access" tab, under > "Choose Data Sources and Data Sets" section click the "Configure" > button. This brings up a window with a "Data Sources" tab, and in > that tab you can click the "Add" button to bring up a dialog that lets > you select "DAS" for the data source type, and enter the URL for a DAS > server. This worked fine for loading data from the UCSC DAS 1.5 > server -- I haven't tried accessing data from any other DAS servers > recently. > > I'm forwarding to the genoviz-devel list for IGB developments and > discussion, to see if anyone currently working on IGB can add any more > info. > > On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Jim Procter > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all (but Gregg in particular!) >> >> I was wondering whether the DAS1 to DAS2 proxy component of Trellis/Ivy >> in the Genomancer project (http://code.google.com/p/genomancer/) is >> stable enough to use. We'd like to set up an in house DAS1->2 proxy and >> it looks like there's a moderate amount of commit activity in the >> project at the moment, making me a little nervous about attempting to >> use the code in a production(ish) setting. >> >> many thanks in advance, >> Jim. >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> J. B. Procter (JALVIEW/ENFIN) Barton Bioinformatics Research Group >> Phone/Fax:+44(0)1382 388734/345764 http://www.compbio.dundee.ac.uk >> The University of Dundee is a Scottish Registered Charity, No. SC015096. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DAS mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das >> > > _______________________________________________ > DAS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das > > > _______________________________________________ > DAS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das _______________________________________________ DAS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das
