+1 On Mar 7, 2011, at 8:38 AM, David Nix wrote:
> My two cents... > > I'm coming late to this thread so pardon if I missing something but I'd > strongly recommend adopting interbase coordinates for DAS/1 (maybe this is > already the case?). This is explicitly specified in DAS/2 spec. It's pretty > critical when it comes to calling SNPs and INDELs. > > -cheers, D > > > On 3/7/11 9:10 AM, "Thomas Down" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Ewan Birney <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I'd say this is start=end, and a convention that this indicates the point >> to the left or the right with a glyph. With this converntion for the edge >> case one either >> has to allow the 0 base (right based insertion convention, insertion at the >> very >> start) or end+1 position (left based insertion convention, insertion at the >> every end). >> > > Thanks Ewan (+Ed and Andy), that sounds best. I'm going to need a > non-standard stylesheet glyph to do what I'm after as well, so perhaps it's > best to attach the "interbaseness" to that, rather than the feature itself. > > >> I know, this triggers doing things on inter-base coordinates, but that's >> just >> a big, big change. >> > > Yep, that's not really an option. > > Thomas. > _______________________________________________ > DAS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das > > > _______________________________________________ > DAS mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das _______________________________________________ DAS mailing list [email protected] http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das
