Hi Leyla,

Quite simply, I imagine this is just unique to UniProt. Most peoples' DAS 
sources are for data generated from a single source, i.e. primary data.

But really I think your problem is that you are wanting to use the method to 
describe how the data behind your annotations is derived (e.g. an experiment, 
or publication) NOT how the annotation itself was derived (i.e. inferred by a 
curator). The semantics are a little fuzzy here, but if you were being pedantic 
about it you should consider the accuracy of this - is your annotation actually 
fully expressed by each of the evidence codes you are using?

For a contrived example, a curator comes to a conclusion that protein X is 
involved in a pathway A via these pieces of evidence:
Experiment 1 says protein X interacts with protein Y.
Experiment 2 says protein X interacts with protein Z.
Paper 3 says proteins Y and Z are part of pathway A.

So in this case, would you use the evidence codes of "inferred by experiment" 
and "inferred from publication", or whatever they are called, to support an 
annotation of "protein X is involved in pathway B"? These are not really 
several methods of producing the annotation - the actual method was the 
curator's ability to combine the conclusions of the other methods. So would you 
use "inferred by curator" instead?

Cheers,
Andy

On 17 Oct 2011, at 13:43, Leyla Garcia wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> At UniProt, we can have more than one method for a feature. It could be the 
> same method but from different sources, for instance "Experimental evidence 
> ECO:0000006" could refer to experiments from Ensembl and InterPro, or totally 
> different methods, for instance "Experimental evidence ECO:0000006" and 
> "Sequence similarity ECO:0000044".
> 
> Currently in DAS 1.6, it is only possible to have one method for each 
> feature. Why? Is there any other DAS server facing a similar situation as 
> UniProt? If there is, how have you solved this problem?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Leyla
> _______________________________________________
> DAS mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das


_______________________________________________
DAS mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.open-bio.org/mailman/listinfo/das

Reply via email to