There was a header in the first file I looked at. I didn't notice the missing headers in the rest. Nice catch.
FWIW, I include you in "our" when I say "our intellectual property backsides". It's not only you that we're trying to protect; potential adopters of the software need protections as well. :-) Wayne On 03/18/2011 12:07 PM, Aaron Digulla wrote: > Zitat von Wayne Beaton <wa...@eclipse.org>: > >> Honestly, I think you're doing a better job than most Eclipse >> projects :-) > > Thanks. I've started the AROS project (www.aros.org) which is a clean > room implementation of the Amiga OS. That started in 1993 and I > learned a lot about international copyright law, IP laws, etc. So I've > been there, done that. > >> Bear in mind that--owing to the fact that you're not a committer >> yet--we're going to have to run this as a contribution through the IP >> process. That shouldn't be a big deal, except that the IP team is >> running pretty hard with Indigo stuff right now. The fact that you've >> got the right headers, and all the right files in the right places >> should make this a lot easier/faster. > > I forgot the headers in the first commits; I hope that's not a problem. > >> [...] >> Hopefully, this doesn't sound scary. We just need to cover our >> intellectual property ownership backsides... > > Looking at Sony vs. Hotz, or on groklaw, it does sound scary. But I > have no intention to ever visit the US - so you can sue me as much as > you like. Switzerland doesn't deport for copyright crimes. > > Regards, > _______________________________________________ dash-dev mailing list dash-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dash-dev
