On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 17:08 +0200, Jon Trowbridge wrote: > On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 08:28 -0600, Chris Lahey wrote: > > Why not just have the uri be http://www.google.com ? Why do you need > > a separate uri scheme? > > Uris should be unique identifiers for hits. If the bookmark uri was > http://www.google.com, it would conflict with the a web history item for > Google's front page.
Why does that matter? It isn't really all that interesting whether a url was found in your history or in your bookmarks, is it? you'd just want one search result, right? Martijn _______________________________________________ Dashboard-hackers mailing list Dashboard-hackers@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers