On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 23:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hmm, I went for the way I did because perror seems to modify it!
> (it reads 28 == ENOSPC before perror, and 29 after...?!?).
>
> Anyway, your point is valid, so I guess we'll just take a copy of errno before
> messing around with error messages.
Oh, weird.
Then, yah, save it off first. ;-)
Robert Love
_______________________________________________
Dashboard-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dashboard-hackers