Syntactically speaking though, what do you think as an extension for dm-types? (if the counterpart changes could be made in dm-migrations)
On Jan 13, 5:02 pm, Michael Klishin <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13.01.2009, at 19:53, heda wrote: > > > there'd obviously be a heck of alot of plumping around this (i'm > > thinking dm-migration) too though which I haven't looked at! > > > What you think? > > I am yet to look into how dm-migrations are organized but I agree that > it belongs to dm-migrations and not dm-types or dm-core (where core > types lives). > > MK --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
